
Besides being genetically committed to the colour of the night, all good Italians must eagerly adopt fashion rule Number Two: When it comes to goods like handbags and footwear, if it’s not leather, don’t consider bringing it near the house. Frankly, I don’t know when or how it happened, but somewhere between the creation of pasta and the rise of Dolce & Gabbana, material other than leather became virtually sacrilegious - think the fashion equivalent of removing the original plastic covering on the orange damask couch in your basement.
And for as long as I can remember, this is the way it was. Sure, you knowingly purchased faux-leather shoes and backpacks - which, of course, you would never, ever, wear in the presence of your omnipotent grandmother - but when you needed a “good” pair of shoes, leather was the involuntary answer.
And in all honestly, it was easy being an acquiescent Italian boy when like-messages were being delivered by the fashion houses; When has black ever been “out” and how often is an It-bag not fabricated from animal skin?
But something inside has changed. No, I haven’t become a vegan or even a vegetarian, but it’s hard to ignore the frivolity of wearing furs and leathers for vanity. That butter-soft leather jacket that once symbolized good taste and more importantly, obedience, now feels irresponsible. Ashley Olsen’s succession of fur coats seems to tread the fine line between good taste and a poor moral foundation. Trust me, I’m no PETA preacher, nor do I intend to be, but I am in the midst of a personal conflict.
On the flip side, despite the slew of articles concerning the rise of un-cruel fashions, it’s still enough of a task finding a good pair of men’s so-called “cruel” shoes. Moreover, while numerous celebrities and designer Stella McCartney have undertaken conscious efforts to make faux-fur desirable, the fact is that this is a domain dominated, for the most part, by the “luxe factor”, of which animal-friendly fashions have yet to achieve on a broad scale.
I have not reached a conclusive stance on the issue as of yet. That said, let’s just say that while black really is the only colour you’ll ever need, I haven’t consumed pasta in years. And I consider myself semi-Italian? Pfft.


While I’m fairly de-sensitized to leather shoes, the idea of draping yourself in an animal skin is just kind of tacky/gross/totally unnecessary to me. Ashley’s coat isn’t even nice enough to offset the ick factor, so all I can think of when I look at it is poor little minks. Or whatever.
Fur is about making a class statement, we have to think that fur represents a step further in “status” manifestations in fashion, so the fight fur maybe we have to think in what status simbols do: make clear who is willing to wear them in spite of killing animals just to say I’m the uber vain b**ch.
Hm, I used to sit on the fence too.
But I’ve eventually found myself on the side of accepting fur and leather… quite love them, actually.
They have natural qualities that make their synthetic imitations seem like wannabes. Good quality leather feels fabulous, actually molds itself to your body, looks just as wonderful when it is old and worn in as it does when it is new and shiny. I love how natural materials possess such sympathetic qualities to the comfort of our own bodies.
Some synthetic furs definitely are awesome, but in my opinion real fur is just like no other textile - when you feel it you can tell. I prefer styles that use fur as an accent personally.
Fur is definitely a Canadiana thing too, so I like that.
I wouldn’t want to live a life without silk, wool, alpaca, angora, good leather boots that form to your feet, leather jackets and fur hats. Then, I also want to enjoy my butter, cheese, smoked salmon, honey, roast chicken, BLTs and omelettes.
Still, we try to source these things as ethically as possible so as not to be too vulgar…
It’s always amazing how fur talk makes the fur fly…
Leather rocks. We eat the animals anyyay